Genetic Counseling--Christian Perspective Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Hereditary Counseling- - Christian Perspective - Essay Example Arrangements for Hemophila can be life putting something aside for the youngster (Lehrman, 1998). On the off chance that the youngster is cut, the parent doesn't sit around idly attempting to stop the blood. Advising after the kid is conceived until they arrive at adulthood can likewise be useful. An early analysis enables the parent and youngster to adapt to their sickness. Fetus removal is murder, however so is willful extermination. Legitimate specialists don't guide individuals to end it all or perform killing on an evil patient. What makes an unborn infant with a sickness that isn't even sure unique? Hereditary testing can't offer 100% yes or no responses. Regardless of whether the youngster has one of the above conditions, hereditary testing can't foresee indications or seriousness of the infection (Rutter). No Christian advocate can support fetus removal. Under the law, they can't forestall premature births, however it is a Christian hereditary counselor’s obligation counsel against end of pregnancy. A Christian hereditary advisor can't deny Biblical lessons. The Bible states â€Å"thou shalt not kill† (Exodus 20:13, King James Version). To direct a lady to have a premature birth would be under any conditions wrong. The Christian advocate must fortify man’s way isn't God’s. A kid with a hereditary imperfection can be mended by God, yet a wiped out youngster can likewise be a gift. Regardless of whether the guardians proceed with the fetus removal, possibly sometime down the road the guardians can be sentenced by what the guide observers today. Whichever way God will favor the instructor for depending on His

Panda Express free essay sample

Fall Gold English 101 Evaluation Panda Express Price; quality; and amount; those are the three principle segments one should search for in a respectable spot to eat. In today’s economy, with the measure of cash we pay for food, we need enough to fulfill us and merit the cash. Quality is an exclusive expectation in today’s food industry. Clients need to know whether the food they are devouring is produced using new and characteristic fixings instead of additives. Amount is an absolute necessity as individuals need a decent measure of item for what they pay for. Shoppers don’t need food that will just fill them for 60 minutes; they need food that is a supper. The main cheap food place that rings a bell that fits these capabilities is Panda Express. Let’s perceive how it remains with the check list, beginning with cost. With the droop the economy is in today, a great many people can’t stand to burn through $8 dollars on a combo dinner that incorporates oily, low quality, cold food. We will compose a custom article test on Panda Express or on the other hand any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Panda Express offers a couple of various choices at a sensible cost. For $7, a three-thing feast incorporates a side of rice or chow demeanor, and three servings of your decision of entrees.Drinks are just $1. 99 for an enormous or $2. 75 for your decision of accessible packaged refreshments. Panda Express even offers kids suppers for under $5. Regardless of your circumstance, there are choices that are delightful and moderate. So with the $7 you pay, let’s take a gander at the nature of food being served and on the off chance that you are getting your money’s worth. Presently a-days, the food business is pushing the cutoff points on the measure of new food they cook with and offer to purchasers, depending primarily on preservatives.Panda Express, in spite of the fact that they do utilize some seasoning, cooks with new vegetables blended in with premium decision meats. They additionally publicize in their foundations that they don't cook with MSG, otherwise called monosodium glutamate, which is a flavor enhancer. The flavor Panda Express consolidates in to their food is regular, new, and delectable. One client on a Panda Express food audit site composed, â€Å"The food is totally flavorful. It isn't just delightful, [but] the introduction is astounding and is yummy to the eyes just as the tummy.I give this eatery very excellent grades for delivering a quality item. † Another reward is that the eatery is extremely well known, which means the food is popular. In this way the food that is as of now out doesn’t have the opportunity to get old and stale. Be that as it may, customers don’t simply need extraordinary tasting food in any sum; they need enough to top them off until the opportunity arrives for their next dinner. At the point when you request your dinner, the side tops off portion of the plate. At that point, you have the three things as your courses which each take up a fourth of the plate.A burger can be eaten in minutes while a full plate at Panda Express sets aside some effort to eat leaving you with time to appreciate the delectable flavors, newness, and nature of your supper. You have a plenty of food to look over as your primary course. With this measure of food, one dinner is ideal for the individuals who do sports and develop colossal hungers, as one model. What's more, on the off chance that you can’t finish such food, you have bounty for left-overs. For the limited quantity you pay, you purchase a phenomenal supper that will top you off for a considerable length of time. For $7, you are purchasing a top notch item.

The Da Vinci Code PROLOGUE

Louver Museum, Paris 10:46 P. M. Prestigious keeper Jacques Sauniere lurched through the vaulted passage of the exhibition hall's Grand Gallery. He thrusted for the closest work of art he could see, a Caravaggio. Snatching the overlaid outline, the seventy-six-year-elderly person hurled the perfect work of art toward himself until it tore from the divider and Sauniere crumbled in reverse in a stack underneath the canvas. As he had envisioned, a roaring iron entryway fell close by, blockading the passageway to the suite. The parquet floor shook. Far away, an alert started to ring. The keeper lay a second, wheezing for breath, assessing the situation. I am still alive.He crept free from the canvas and examined the enormous space for somewhere to cover up. A voice talked, chillingly close. â€Å"Do not move.† On all fours, the keeper solidified, turning his head gradually. Just fifteen feet away, outside the fixed door, the uneven outline of his assailant gazed through the iron bars. He was wide and tall, with phantom fair skin and diminishing white hair. His irises were pink with dim red students. The pale skinned person drew a gun from his jacket and pointed the barrel through the bars, legitimately at the guardian. â€Å"You ought not have run.† His pronunciation was difficult to put. â€Å"Now disclose to me where it is.† â€Å"I let you know already,† the guardian stammered, stooping vulnerable on the floor of the display. â€Å"I have no clue about what you are talking about!† â€Å"You are lying.† The man gazed at him, entirely stable aside from the glimmer in his spooky eyes. â€Å"You and your brethren have something that isn't yours.† The keeper felt a flood of adrenaline. How might he be able to perhaps know this? â€Å"Tonight the legitimate gatekeepers will be reestablished. Disclose to me where it is covered up, and you will live.† The man leveled his weapon at the keeper's head. â€Å"Is it a mystery you will kick the bucket for?† Sauniere couldn't relax. The man inclined his head, peering down the barrel of his weapon. Sauniere held up his hands in safeguard. â€Å"Wait,† he said gradually. â€Å"I will mention to you what you have to know.† The caretaker expressed his next words cautiously. The falsehood he told was one he had practiced numerous times†¦ each time imploring he could never need to utilize it. At the point when the custodian had wrapped up, his attacker grinned egotistically. â€Å"Yes. This is actually what the others told me.† Sauniere pulled back. The others? â€Å"I discovered them, too,† the immense man provoked. â€Å"All three of them. They affirmed what you have simply said.† It can't be! The caretaker's actual character, alongside the personalities of his three senechaux, was nearly as holy as the old mystery they secured. Sauniere now understood his senechaux, following exacting method, had told a similar lie before their own demises. It was a piece of the convention. The aggressor pointed his firearm once more. â€Å"When you are gone, I will be the one in particular who knows the truth.† The truth.In a moment, the caretaker got a handle on the genuine frightfulness of the circumstance. On the off chance that I bite the dust, reality will be lost forever.Instinctively, he attempted to scramble for spread. The weapon thundered, and the custodian felt a burning warmth as the projectile held up in his stomach. He fell forward†¦ battling against the torment. Gradually, Sauniere turned over and gazed back through the bars at his aggressor. The man was currently training in on Sauniere's head. Sauniere shut his eyes, his considerations a twirling storm of dread and lament. The snap of a vacant chamber resounded through the hall. The custodian's eyes flew open. The man looked down at his weapon, looking nearly diverted. He went after a subsequent clasp, yet then appeared to reevaluate, smiling smoothly at Sauniere's gut. â€Å"My work here is done.† The custodian looked down and saw the slug opening in his white cloth shirt. It was surrounded by a little hover of blood a couple of crawls underneath his breastbone. My stomach.Almost cold-bloodedly, the slug had missed his heart. As a veteran of la Guerre d'Algerie, the keeper had seen this terribly drawn-out death previously. For fifteen minutes, he would make due as his stomach acids saturated his chest depression, gradually harming him from inside. â€Å"Pain is acceptable, monsieur,† the man said. At that point he was no more. Alone now, Jacques Sauniere turned his look again to the iron door. He was caught, and the entryways couldn't be revived for at any rate twenty minutes. When anybody got to him, he would be dead. All things being equal, the dread that presently held him was a dread far more noteworthy than that of his own demise. I should pass on the mystery. Faltering to his feet, he envisioned his three killed brethren. He thought of the ages who had preceded them†¦ of the crucial which they had all been endowed. A whole chain of information. Abruptly, presently, regardless of all the precautions†¦ in spite of all the fizzle safes†¦ Jacques Sauniere was the main residual connection, the sole watchman of one of the most impressive insider facts at any point kept. Shuddering, he pulled himself to his feet. I should discover some way†¦ . He was caught inside the Grand Gallery, and there existed just a single individual on earth to whom he could pass the light. Sauniere looked up at the dividers of his extravagant jail. An assortment of the world's most acclaimed works of art appeared to grin down on him like old companions. Jumping in torment, he called the entirety of his resources and quality. The frantic assignment before him, he knew, would require each staying second of his life.

Scientific Advancement in the 20th Century Essay

Logical Advancement in the twentieth Century - Essay Example Rather than investigating the issue on logical premise, they have clung to their timeworn belief systems with a down to earth give up to the materialistic qualities stylish. Indeed, even the torchbearers, the alleged educated people and current researchers of any religion claim to be side by side with the cutting edge logical idea have yielded to the surge of present day sciences and in mystery profundities of their souls feel anxious how to safeguard their position. They are accomplishing a greater number of damages than great by guarding their post with bygone weapons. Like the instance of William James in his Assortments of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature composed: Disappointment, at that point, disappointment! So the world stamps us every step of the way. We fling it with our botches, our wrongdoings, our lost chances, with all the commemorations of our deficiency to our livelihood. Also, with what a dooming accentuation does it at that point blotch us out! No simple fine, no unimportant expression of remorse or formal appeasement, will fulfill the world's requests, however every pound of substance demanded is drenched with all its blood. The subtlest types of enduring known to man are associated with the harmful mortifications accidental to these outcomes. Also, they are critical human encounters. A procedure so omnipresent and everlasting is clearly a necessary piece of life. 'There is in fact one component in human fate,' Robert Louis Stevenson composes, 'that not visual impairment itself can oppose. Whatever else we are proposed to do, we are not expected to succeed; disappointment is the destiny apportioned.' And our tendency being theref ore established in disappointment, is anyone surprised that scholars ought to have held it to be basic, and imagined that just through the individual experience of embarrassment which it causes the more profound feeling of life's centrality is reached (Varieties, p. 138) The primary explanation of this tumble to shame and scorn, is the essayist's lack of interest towards logical controls. It has put among the tail-enders on the planet. An inside and out request of mankind's history uncovers that our progenitors spread idea and reasoning to the entire world and established various logical controls. Had our ancestors not practiced their pioneer work in the field of observational sciences, the contemporary logical orders would never have formed into their current status. They unfolded in the expressions of William James and others1 with intelligence on the Western considerations and suffocated in murk and haziness of obliviousness. This way of thinking adequately fled on our enlightening heredity. What's more, we saved everything stupidly. The science is progressing significantly. As appeared in the William work, he was properly pleased with his boss transformative status among the comity of countries. As he keep poor people and the denied needy and repressed, he additionally planned to see different religions under their oppressing authority. His philosophical idea and progress is eating up topographical separations and the world spread more than a huge number of miles has been decreased to Global town. Attributable to logical advancement, deserts are being changed into knolls and prolific fields. The mineral riches is attracted to one feet. Logical information has empowered to bring all the regular sources under human control and utilization. This is, in any case, deplorable to take note of that his logical methodologies are resolutely bowed after keeping the retrogressive countries needy and repressed. In this respects, the minorities are very much characterized target. Like

Contract and Chou free essay sample

The case situation under audit by our group incorporates an agreement law circumstance including a tabletop game organization and a game creator. Big Time Toymaker (BTT) is a prepackaged game organization which creates, makes, and appropriates tabletop games, and Chou is the name of the creator of another methodology game. In this situation, what started with an installment produced using BTT to Chou for selective arranging rights for 90 days, finished in an adjustment in the board at BTT, prompting their organization done having enthusiasm for conveying Chou’s game. A few inquiries will be posed about the legitimacy of the terms settled upon by the gatherings in question, including when did the gatherings have an agreement, and what job does the resolution of fakes play in this agreement? Our goal is to examine the case situation, including the recently expressed inquiries, and give the responses to those and different inquiries relating to the situation and agreement law. Question 1 when, if at any point, did the gatherings have an agreement? There was shared understanding among Chou and BTT by means of verbal understanding, and a resulting email confirming that an understanding had been probably reached. As indicated by the terms of dissemination among Chou and BTT an agreement was just substantial whenever formalized recorded as a hard copy. A contention might be made that three days before the multi day time limit a shared understanding was reached and substantial by means of an E-contract law. There was common consent between both Chou and BTT. The contention for the opposite side will state there was never a formalized composed agreement from either Chou or BTT, just an email with a subject heading expressing Strat Deal. Is the email a legitimate agreement? Question 2 What realities may say something favor of or against Chou regarding parties’ target aim to contract? Realities show that BTT sent an email with a subject heading of Strat Deal with data expressing that Chou and BTT have agreed. The composing states that following quite a while of no reaction from BTT and with no administration set up the organization no longer wishes to convey Chou’s protected innovation. Chou was in consistence with BTT consistently in regards to issues relating to Strat. Chou will claim that there was an agreement among himself and BTT that was of common consent and under E-contract law the messages were legitimate. Question 3 Does the way that the gatherings were imparting by email have any effect on your investigation in questions 1-2 above? As per CA Civil Code 1624, b 3, an, online agreements are endorsable regardless of whether composing is required by the resolution of fakes. Correspondence of agreements is legitimate under E-contract law. There is no effect on investigation made of above expressed inquiries on account of online correspondence. Question 4 What job does the rule of fakes play in this agreement? A key factor in any agreement is acknowledgment, and for this situation a verbal understanding had been arrived at three days before the selective arrangement right was terminated. Chou at that point said he was going to draw up the agreement. Big Time Toymaker (BTT) at that point sent Chou an email laying out everything that they had settled upon that would be remembered for the agreement. Seeing the email, Chou at that point accepted this was the agreement to be implemented and didn't react to BTT. Despite the fact that Chou got the email, he didn't react to it, consequently giving Chou the resistance that quietness is never acknowledgment. In any case, in E-contact law directed by CA Civil Code 1624, b, 3, an, it says that online agreements are endorsable regardless of whether composing is required by the resolution of cheats. What's more, the â€Å"Click On† or â€Å"Click Wrap† understanding proviso expresses that these understandings are enforceable since the chance to peruse and recognize was given. The rules of cheats do have an impact in this agreement because of the Uniform Commercial Code necessitating that the rule of fakes applies to any agreement for the offer of merchandise for $500 or more. Be that as it may, the specific measure of â€Å"Strat† units that Big Time Toymaker (BTT) will sell or at what cost of every unit is indistinct to the peruser, it was depicted in detail in the email BTT sent to Chou. Question 5 Could BTT keep away from this agreement under the precept of slip-up? Clarify. The new administration at BTT can't keep away from this agreement under the regulation of mix-up on the grounds that an error was not made by both Chou and the old supervisory crew. The error by Chou was tolerating the email layout of the agreement terms as a genuine agreement consented to by the two gatherings. Scienter applies to Chou for this situation by tolerating an apparently authentic agreement. Would either party have whatever other guards that would permit the agreement to be kept away from? The difference in the executives realized people bound to a similar organization as the old supervisory crew might have been, along these lines, scienter applies to the new supervisory group in privity. The draft sent from Chou and got by BTT is a debatable instrument. BTT in this way turns into a holder at the appropriate time. The inaction of BTT after the draft was sent is infringing upon the UCC prerequisite that all offers are to be open for a sensible time of 90 days. Chou was under the feeling that an agreement had been made before that 90 days had lapsed. Chou has genuine safeguard just as close to home protection because of break of agreement and misrepresentation. Question 6 Assuming, arguendo, that this email does comprise an understanding, what thought bolsters this understanding? By law, resolution of fakes would bolster this understanding. Because of the terms, there can't be a claim that can be maintained on specific agreements or game plans, with the exception of in the event that it is composed and marked by the approved party or delegate. Under the resolution, particular sorts of agreements must be recorded as a hard copy so as to be enforceable in a courtroom (Contracts: Statute of Frauds, 2013). The composing likewise must be marked by the individual who is considered liable for the agreement or by that people operator. To dodge the legitimization of the Statute of Frauds, one would need to ensure the agreements are in content and marked by the other party; along these lines, if the restricting party doesn't hold their finish of the understanding, one would pick up from that specific gathering. Question Accepting BTT and Chou have an agreement, and BTT has penetrated the agreement by not conveying the game, talk about what cures may or probably won't have any significant bearing. It is evident BTT’s chief didn't ponder shielding BTT from risk. He indiscreetly composed the messages, and his reckless activities put BTT in danger. This persuaded this email was intended to supplant the prior thought that he should draft an agreement. Despite the fact that the word contract was not ever utilized in the email, it said that the entirety of the terms had been settled upon. The pay would be granted to Chou by the court in a common activity because of the illegitimate direct, being the penetrate from the other party, BTT. In the event that the agreement is penetrated by BTT, Chou will be allowed evenhanded help by the court, which comes as explicit execution, injunctive alleviation, or transformation. Money related harms could likewise be basically, in which they can be compensatory, coming about because of a misfortune because of nonperformance. Additionally, weighty, which are aberrant yet not out of the ordinary from non-finishing. Compensation would likewise occur that would be identical to add up to the gathering has been unjustifiably enhanced by the non-penetrating gathering, and exchanged, which harms are a preset worth rendering from the understanding. The compensatory harms for recuperation Chou endured by the non-penetrating gathering would be the harms that would be granted to the gathering in a similar circumstance he would host been in if the other get-together had executed as settled upon (Melvin, 2011). After survey of the case situation including Big Time Toymaker and Chou the game innovator, we have reasoned that not exclusively was there an agreement understanding between the gatherings, however that as indicated by E-contract law, Chou might be limited by the terms remembered for the first email sent from BTT. What's more, the regulation of misstep can't be utilized in this circumstance in light of scienter toward Chou and the old and new administration of BTT. A few inquiries were posed of our group as per contract law and the situation gave by the course book. This finishes our investigation of the situation and answers to the inquiries we were introduced.

We are artists writers

We are artists writers Its important to recognize that while MIT is known for top-notch engineering and science programs, this school actually has the resources to foster all kinds of creative juice. I wanted to introduce one such example, and that is RUNE, MITs journal of art and literature. Having partaken in a literary magazine in high school, I knew it was something I want to continue doing. So what is RUNE as a club like? We are a group of MIT students (both undergraduate and graduate) who really enjoy creative writing and the visual arts. But more importantly, we believe that we can tap into the wealth of creative gems embedded in all the scientific/engineering ingenuity at MIT. Basically, RUNE solicits art and literature submissions from the MIT community and meets weekly to review those submissions for inclusion in a glossy magazine published annually at the end of the spring semester. Truth be told, RUNE is traditionally small, with a staff never far beyond 10, and low-key; think of us as a weekly reading club …that produces a beautiful magazine at the end of the school year. I personally like the mellowness that way, its easier to avoid bureaucracy, value each staff members opinions (which do often conflict), and focus on the creative works. To me, RUNE is at once a bigger mission to support the arts @ MIT as well as a weekly relaxation session. We meet every Sunday at 2PM, on some cozy futons in a small room in the Student Center. Packed into the hourly meetings are art and literature submissions that paint places as close and mundane as MIT and as far-away and unfathomable as the limits of fantasy allow. Certainly a change of rhythm from the chaos of the same old coursework during the week. Here are some scans of artworks from our latest issue. (See more works by Dorian 11 here) What do you think? In any case, just putting it out there that there are two things we constantly need at RUNE and they are submissions and funding. We need submissions to compile a quality magazine, and funding to keep it free for the MIT community.  So if youre a member of the MIT community, feel free to submit your best creative work. For literature:  [emailprotected]  For art:    [emailprotected] ….. And if anyone has any leads on relevant sources of grants/funding, please let me know in the comments. Thanks! Lastly, while RUNE captures the art in text and images…there are some incredible living breathing instances of natural art that must be savored live-action. OMG! Post Tagged #MIT Rune Journal of Arts and Letters

The Smartest Test Takers I Know

Strong scores are not the only way to spot the smartest test takers among us. I encounter such students every day, and they stand out from the crowd in 5 key ways. Cultivating these important traits will help sophomores understand how their behavior and mindset over the next year can produce successful testing outcomes and actually take advantage of the changes confronting the class of 2017. The Smartest Test Takers I Know Its been an eventful year, literally. My partners at Compass and I have spoken at 100+ college admission events around the country, as thirst for strategic guidance on testing is greater than ever. Class of 2017 families put in the crosshairs of the fast-approaching SAT changes have been contemplating how to reconcile their personal timelines and decisions with those of the College Board. At every presentation from high school College Nights to faculty workshops to college counselor conferences our purpose has been to help folks contextualize these changes, individualize their plans, and chart a simplified course for the year ahead. At one event last springs Annual Conference for the Western Association For College Admission Counseling I titled my session Behavioral Truths of Confident College Applicants. I was the testing expert and my co-presenter was a college counselor and former college admission officer. We examined the role of individual behavior and what specific behaviors we observe on a daily basis that let students navigate college admission and testing with a posture of confidence. While representing different dimensions of the college journey, we drew on a shared philosophy that places preparedness, thoughtfulness, and accountability at the center of a successful college experience. Our premise was that when students understand deeply what they are currently doing and why, suddenly individual behavior becomes the best predictor of success. Affirming that theory, the smartest test takers from the class of 2017 are already emerging. No, Im not talking about their test scores not yet, at least. Im talking about their behaviors. As sophomores transition to juniors, the ones destined for optimal testing outcomes share a few notable characteristics. They Are Pragmatic The smartest test takers I know neither underestimate nor overestimate the importance of testing in the college admission process. They remain grounded and sensible about it, unaffected by the hype and uninfluenced by the emotions of others. Rather than letting fear or self-pity set the tone of the year ahead, these students will matter-of-factly accept testing as a relevant but not all-consuming or defining component of their high school record. Pragmatic students move on quickly to determining how to make testing serve their needs rather than dash their dreams. Pragmatists make no room for defeatism in their lives. They Are Planners Great planners use calendar as a verb. All smart test takers calendar well, and they start by counting backwards from the fall of senior year. Poor planners (and bad advisors), in contrast, tend to disregard real-world timelines and merely think in terms of taking tests isolated events aimlessly scattered across school years. Savvy students, meanwhile, work backwards from test dates so that proper preparation and reaction timelines can take shape. They first frame their entire testing window and then sketch in what they already know or reasonably expect will occupy their lives during that period. I guided one sophomore through this exercise today, and she arrived at a tailored, yet fairly common, starting game plan. Hers looks like this: Take a proctored diagnostic ACT after school ends in June. Receive individualized, foundational ACT preparation this summer. [One 90-minute private lesson per week with assignments between lessons feels reasonable to her.] Take a follow-up practice ACT at the end of summer to help determine when she will take her first official ACT. Take the redesigned PSAT on October 14th (at school) to help determine her comfort level with the redesigned SAT. Given the pedagogical dovetailing of the ACT and new SAT, the foundational ACT preparation this summer will serve this student well and allow her to keep options open. She may feel poised to take an ACT in the fall (September or October), or she may opt to delay that until the winter (December) or early spring (February) to get part of junior years coursework beneath her and to refresh her test preparation. For others, it may be smart to start preparation in the fall or winter and target tests in April or June. She may also come to conclude that her summer effort prepared her nearly enough for what the new SAT has planned for her. In that case, she may take the new SAT (likely, March, May, or October) with only a modest amount of SAT-specific preparation. She anticipates Subject Tests will be in her mix, too, and has wisely earmarked next June for those. She has at least four candidate subjects in mind based on next years courses and will take practice tests next April to zero in on her strongest ones. By the end of next June, shell know her GPA through junior year; shell have one (or two) official ACT scores; shell have her Subject Tests completed. Having refined her college list by then, shell enter the summer by taking honest inventory of where things stand and will decide if re-testing in the fall is necessary. Even if she chooses to apply early somewhere, she knows she can and may need to test in September (ACT) or October (new SAT) of senior year to reach her goals. They Are Resilient Like the student mentioned above, smart test takers map out a plan early but are willing to make small course corrections as they navigate their path. While staying nimble, they are also able to remain persistent. They trust the thoughtful guidance theyve received, they make rational and informed decisions, and they stay focused on long-term attainable goals theyve set for themselves. They know test preparation is hard work that involves some frustration and disappointment. A sub-par score along the way wont derail them. Testing is not a box smart students try to check off the list as soon as possible. Instead, it is deliberately integrated into the overall process of getting ready for college affording students time to grow into their scoring potential. They Are Drivers Occasionally, students call our offices themselves. Poised and articulate as they ask great questions about our approach, they reveal themselves as some of the most engaged, no-nonsense test takers we know. Appropriately self-interested, these students are in search of expertise and first-rate support. As busy teens already managing full plates, they grasp the concept of opportunity cost. So while they are willing to invest time and effort to gain control of these tests, they have no tolerance for gimmicks. The latest gimmick cooked up by the largest couple of test prep empires is the so-called hybrid (and now tri-brid!) test. Recklessly billed as worthwhile time-savers, these concoctions may make good advertising but deliver nothing in the way of reliable diagnostic insight. By blending flavors, a hybrid test bears a superficial resemblance to parts of different tests (ACT, current SAT, future SAT), but it is in fact more of a casserole of question types that breaks all the rules and equates to a potluck testing experience. Lots of empty test taking calories with no nutritional value. Smart test takers (and counselors) know to eschew such novelties and steer clear of anybody who promotes an all-you-can-eat testing diet. Given the availability of authentic sample tests written by the actual testing organizations, smart test takers will refine their testing palates by sticking only to those psychometrically superior diagnostic and practice resources. They Are Sensible The most rational students dont get fazed by rumors surrounding the new SAT especially ones that defy common sense. Old or new, the SAT (and ACT) will always be a measure of relative standing. The smartest test taker, therefore, understands that he or she is not the only one affected by this transition and trusts that the College Board will have a fair test in place. That said, sensible students would not allow their individual testing plans to be compromised by a multi-year rollout of a public policy decision. As one student recently reflected to me, From everything Ive read, the new SAT sounds like its going to be a good test. Im just not sure the timing is going to work for me. Hes not alone in his thinking. The current SAT is sticking around through January, but primarily for the class of 2016 to re-test as seniors. Meanwhile, the new SAT will likely hit its stride with the class of 2018. For this transitional class of 2017, common sense says to make alternate plans. Indeed, the new SAT may temporarily fall victim to an old SAT test-taking strategy: process of elimination. Although this class will have three tests to choose from, there are practical limitations to consider: The current SAT, and virtually all its DNA, is facing extinction before most students are ready to take their first official test. While there is still time to prepare for the current SAT, there wont be time on the backend to stay with this test long enough to reach ones goals. And because the test is changing so significantly, nearly all preparation for the expiring test will be a sunk cost with little long-term application. Of course, for the handful of extraordinarily skilled test takers who can confidently post entirely satisfying scores by January, there is little to worry about. The new SAT may have a bright future, but it has no history. Smart and sensible test takers rely on the history of a test to ready themselves; they learn from what has come and those who have gone before. Despite the promise of summer sample tests, free Khan Academy resources, and a new PSAT, the College Boards research team needs every minute between now and March (and weeks, months, and years beyond then) to bring this brand new test to fruition. The March administration is not the end game, but rather an important early step in a rollout that will continue well after the class of 2017 is in college. Vital psychometric work from possible re-centering to setting concordance to conducting validity studies still needs to happen and takes time. Operational issues, like the re-training of proctors and essay graders, need to be ironed out. PSAT and March SAT scores are likely to be delayed. The class of 2017s expert planners those pragmatic drivers of this process are accounting f or all of this. While not completing eliminating the current SAT and new SAT as choices, they are giving favorable consideration to the ACT as in standardized testing terms â€Å"the best answer†. Common sense also serves students well when they ponder the important question of how colleges are preparing for this impacted class. Sensible students realize that colleges dont admit them, humans do. We call them admission officers not denial officers for a reason. And not coincidentally, the college admission officers I know possess all of the traits Ive unpacked above. They are accomplished forecasters and decision-makers, so it stands to reason that they, too, are pragmatic, sensible, and knowledgably engaged. They like information and reliable data; they understand context; and they look to the past to predict the future. Colleges, therefore, won’t constrain themselves by eliminating choices. As the ultimate end-users of test scores, colleges are facing a corresponding transition and will behave rationally to keep options open. To be clear, colleges will accept any and all test scores old SAT, new SAT, and/or ACT from the class of 2017. Many colleges have already officially stated this; the rest eventually will. Even allowing for a shift to the ACT and a last-minute push for the old SAT, at least 1.5 million students from the class of 2017 will take close to 3 million new SATs. No college is capable of ceding so many students to other institutions. Colleges will have enough acceptable evidence by then (mostly through College Board field-testing and comparability studies involving college freshman and the class of 2016) that will link old and new SAT scores via a concordance. They will also be given a synthetic concordance that links SAT and ACT scores. Accepting – and fairly weighing – current SAT, ACT, and new SAT scores is the smartest choice for building the best possible class. A liberal policy also lays the groundwork for the future. Admission offices ultimately must discard much of what they know about the current SAT, and quickly learn the new SAT. Admitted students from the class of 2017 will provide the basis for colleges’ own validity studies. So, in the end, sensible test takers realize that colleges will support their choices – not as lip service, but as a purposeful decision in the colleges’ best interests. Who Will Be the Smartest Test Takers in the Class of 2017? Its impossible to stay ahead of all the information not to mention the misinformation swirling around us about college admission testing. The smartest students I know wont try to do so. Theyll instead strive to simplify this exercise by driving the process, mapping a course of action, and remaining focused, resilient, confident, and sensible. Theyll identify what hurdles lie ahead, and theyll take them in stride. Theyll seek out first-rate expertise and guidance and ignore the rest. Watch for these students their behavior gives them away.